Open CASCADE, the 3D modelling kernel
3D modeling & numerical simulation

Search the Forums
See All Topics
Open CASCADEShowroomGet it!Developer CornerSupport and ProductsAbout us
Technical overview
Areas of use
Advantages
FAQ
Screenshots
Shape factory
Shape gallery
Demonstrations
What's new
System requirements
Download Center
Public license
Documentation
Getting started
Forums
Open Source community
Training and e-learning
A-la Carte Support
Value-added software
Complementary Components
Customer Corner
Company Profile
Marketing Materials
Contact Us
News
Home / Developer Corner / Forums / Usage issues / The Open CASCADE license

The Open CASCADE license

The Open CASCADE license
Tom Callaway 2013/04/12 19:54
I know there have been several threads on this topic over the last 4 years or so, but I would like to try again.

A little background: I am the lead licensing person with Fedora (and the Fedora Engineering Manager at Red Hat). I work closely with Red Hat Legal, and interested parties like the Free Software Foundation to try to resolve licensing issues that prevent us from including otherwise high quality software into our distribution.

While the existing Open CASCADE license has a number of areas which make it completely GPL-incompatible, there is one area which makes the license non-free (and thus, not acceptable for Fedora and a number of other distributions):

Section 7 says:

You may choose to offer, *on a non-exclusive basis*, and to charge a
fee for any warranty, support, maintenance, liability obligations or
other rights consistent with the scope of this License with respect to
the Software to the recipients of the Software ....

The wording that I have highlighted in asterisks is the problem. As I said previously,
limiting this permission to "a non-exclusive basis" is bizarre. Why can't someone
choose to offer support exclusively to customer A but not any other customer? A fair
number of FOSS licenses have upstream indemnification clauses, but this goes beyond that.

The easiest fix to this license would be to drop "on a non-exclusive basis" from that sentence.

That said, the better fix would be to relicense this work under the LGPLv2+, as that would remove all of the GPL compatibility concerns and encourage wide-spread adoption of the technology.

Please seriously consider this request!
 
 
Latest news
  • New features to enhance the development process
  • Open CASCADE Technology 6.7.1 is available for download!
  • Open CASCADE Technology 6.7.0 is available for download!

  • © OPEN CASCADE 2000 - 2014  |  Search  |  Contacts   |  Site map